![]() ![]() So if Leone supervised the editing of a film that was epic in length, and which he intended to be a high prestige and high quality film, it would be natural for him to include an intermission since the film qualified on two separate counts for having an intermission. Ebert's television film critic partner Gene Siskel considered the uncut version to be the best film of 1984 and the shortened, linear studio version to be the worst film of 1984.Ĭonsidering how much Leone's version is praised by critics, Leone probably considered his version to be a work of cinematic art and a prestige film. ![]() Roger Ebert wrote in his 1984 review that the uncut version was "an epic poem of violence and greed" but described the American theatrical version as a "travesty". Some critics compared shortening the film to shortening Richard Wagner's operas, saying that works of art that are meant to be long should be given the respect they deserve. This condensed version was a critical and financial disaster, and many American critics who knew of Leone's original cut attacked the short version. I also note that version is considered to be a classic movie. The version that Sergio Leone supervised the editing of was the international theatrical version 229 minutes long.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |